Mary Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 Thanks Janet. What these dancers go through- the agony. Ms Takada is evidently an incredibly tough woman- hardly a 'china doll' (!) - and my admiration for her-very high anyway and even higher after Rubies at the weekend- has even increased after reading this. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
annamk Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 11 hours ago, bangorballetboy said: Some of us have had the pleasure of watching Takada grow from a very technically talented dancer into a very well rounded Royal Ballet dancer who works well in a number of styles. Her promotion last summer was, IMO, thoroughly deserved. Spot on ! I never used to think of myself as a fan but Takada has been outstanding in everything I've seen her dance for the last year or so (Pigeons, Giselle, Aurora, Carbon Life etc .... ) her Rubies debut last week was no less than sensational 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnS Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 Thank you - a lovely article (which didn't seem to be behind a paywall). Akane's Giselle was exquisite, for me the most moving portrayal last run, and it's good to see her being recognised more widely. In response to some of the comments above, it would be interesting to know how many references there are on the Forum to individual dancers and I would guess that Akane has attracted fewer comments than a number of others. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwissBalletFan Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 (edited) 6 minutes ago, JohnS said: Thank you - a lovely article (which didn't seem to be behind a paywall). Akane's Giselle was exquisite, for me the most moving portrayal last run, and it's good to see her being recognised more widely. In response to some of the comments above, it would be interesting to know how many references there are on the Forum to individual dancers and I would guess that Akane has attracted fewer comments than a number of others. This is easily done with the search function. A quick comparison: Naghdi 777 Takada 390 results. Of course not all relevant, but quite a marked difference. Edited April 11, 2017 by SwissBalletFan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zxDaveM Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 Ms Takada was easily my favourite 'Girl' in 2 Pigeons last run - and probably Giselle too. So good to see her back in prime form after her debilitating injury. I always enjoy her performances :-) Nice article and great to see her featured 7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacqueline Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 Interesting article and as mentioned above, not behind a paywall. Unlike the review of Casanova by Debra Craine. Could someone give me the gist of what she said if possible. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jan McNulty Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 14 minutes ago, Jacqueline said: Interesting article and as mentioned above, not behind a paywall. Unlike the review of Casanova by Debra Craine. Could someone give me the gist of what she said if possible. Thanks. It was marginally better than Judith Mackrell's but not much! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jan McNulty Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 Try the link again Jacqueline. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacqueline Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 21 minutes ago, Janet McNulty said: Try this link: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/dance-casanova-at-theatre-royal-norwich-lhv32lmfz?shareToken=89d94b829232db6a95d327561dea2a34 Many thanks for the link, Janet. It is as you say, marginally better. Although describing the work as "ponderous and gloomy" seems astonishing really, given the visual imagery alone. For me, it was a terrific afternoon's entertainment at the Lyceum. Casanova was never going to be a particularly sympathetic character, he was too self absorbed to be someone you could care about. But we were not being invited to care about him were we? I thought Tindall was just after making him more than the one dimensional lothario of legend and in this I felt he succeeded. We learned quite a lot about him and what motivated his actions, not least the times in which he lived. I found the programmes notes useful and interesting, but would probably have been able to follow the action without them. I'll never know because I cannot unread the programme and see the ballet again. But I certainly do want to see it again. Anyway, each to their own. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nina G. Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 Lovely article on Miss Takada. First time I saw her dance was in Life Fire Exercise. She was really impressive but she somehow "disappeared" thereafter. Now I know she was injured. She deserves all the praise as she was outstanding in Rubies. Good to see the RB Press directing the Times newspaper to focus on another very talented dancer, for a change. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lizbie1 Posted April 11, 2017 Share Posted April 11, 2017 1 hour ago, Nina G. said: Good to see the RB Press directing the Times newspaper to focus on another very talented dancer, for a change. I think we should give Debra Craine and the Times a bit more credit than that - in my view they and the Sunday Times are streets ahead of the rest of the press in their commitment to and coverage of ballet (and indeed opera) and are quite capable of sniffing out a worthy candidate for an interview by themselves. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Macmillan Posted April 11, 2017 Author Share Posted April 11, 2017 Sorry, for clarification - "RB Press"?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jacqueline Posted April 16, 2017 Share Posted April 16, 2017 (edited) Nothing to report from the incredible, shrinking Sunday Times today. Is it my imagination or is the paper doing an Alice and getting smaller and smaller? I did like the Telegraph article seen in today's links, regarding the ROH's latest appeal for donations. I received such a letter and admit it had a similar effect on me to those mentioned. Given the state of the world and that appeals usually focus on what one might term real and in many cases, desperate need, it does seem beyond parody to be asked to donate money to pay for crystals to adorn a caterpillar's shoes , the glue with which to adhese them and various other sundries. Although I realise the appeal is aimed at those most likely to appreciate the cost, having seen a number of productions that were a "triumph" of expensive style over substance I wonder about budgetary decisions sometimes. Still, if people want to donate, that is their choice. There was also reference in the letter to an amount of money that would pay for seven tutus for the new production of Swan Lake. Is this perhaps a clue as to what is in store if they are strapped for cash - a reduction in the corp numbers. Or perhaps there are seven more swans to cover the additional choreography. What excitement! Edited April 16, 2017 by Jacqueline 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beryl H Posted April 17, 2017 Share Posted April 17, 2017 18 hours ago, Jacqueline said: Nothing to report from the incredible, shrinking Sunday Times today. Is it my imagination or is the paper doing an Alice and getting smaller and smaller? I did like the Telegraph article seen in today's links, regarding the ROH's latest appeal for donations. I received such a letter and admit it had a similar effect on me to those mentioned. Given the state of the world and that appeals usually focus on what one might term real and in many cases, desperate need, it does seem beyond parody to be asked to donate money to pay for crystals to adorn a caterpillar's shoes , the glue with which to adhese them and various other sundries. Although I realise the appeal is aimed at those most likely to appreciate the cost, having seen a number of productions that were a "triumph" of expensive style over substance I wonder about budgetary decisions sometimes. Still, if people want to donate, that is their choice. There was also reference in the letter to an amount of money that would pay for seven tutus for the new production of Swan Lake. Is this perhaps a clue as to what is in store if they are strapped for cash - a reduction in the corp numbers. Or perhaps there are seven more swans to cover the additional choreography. What excitement! I agree about the Sunday Times, fewer sections, I suppose there were a lot before, and the print seems to be smaller too which is causing me eye problems, the magazines and prints are smaller too. Good news for my letterbox I suppose which was under strain before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Two Pigeons Posted April 17, 2017 Share Posted April 17, 2017 On 11/04/2017 at 19:25, Lizbie1 said: I think we should give Debra Craine and the Times a bit more credit than that - in my view they and the Sunday Times are streets ahead of the rest of the press in their commitment to and coverage of ballet (and indeed opera) and are quite capable of sniffing out a worthy candidate for an interview by themselves. except of course when that ballet is somewhere like Birmingham. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toursenlair Posted April 17, 2017 Share Posted April 17, 2017 23 hours ago, Jacqueline said: I did like the Telegraph article seen in today's links, regarding the ROH's latest appeal for donations. I received such a letter and admit it had a similar effect on me to those mentioned. Given the state of the world and that appeals usually focus on what one might term real and in many cases, desperate need, it does seem beyond parody to be asked to donate money to pay for crystals to adorn a caterpillar's shoes , the glue with which to adhese them and various other sundries. Although I realise the appeal is aimed at those most likely to appreciate the cost, having seen a number of productions that were a "triumph" of expensive style over substance I wonder about budgetary decisions sometimes. Still, if people want to donate, that is their choice. There was also reference in the letter to an amount of money that would pay for seven tutus for the new production of Swan Lake. Is this perhaps a clue as to what is in store if they are strapped for cash - a reduction in the corp numbers. Or perhaps there are seven more swans to cover the additional choreography. What excitement! Speaking as a North American where such fundraising appeals have been standard in the arts for decades, I was quite surprised by the negative backlash. For that matter, I believe BRB used similar tactics a few years ago for their new Cinderella. Many donors like to understand the value of their donation in these terms, rather than having it swallowed up into some vague operating fund. It is also a way of educating the audience as to how much things cost... yes, even the spirit gum for the facial hair. 9 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JohnS Posted April 17, 2017 Share Posted April 17, 2017 I agree with toursenlair and think the ROH should be congratulated for its fund raising initiatives. Box office revenue and grant cover only part of the costs and in recent years the ROH has become increasingly reliant on sponsorship, donations, legacies etc. I thought the Nutcracker pointe shoe appeal championed by Lauren Cuthbertson a couple of years ago, and with more junior dancers decorating the tree with signed messages on point shoe cut outs from donors, was wonderful. We also see the continuing pointe shoe appeal regularly in the cinema relays. It strikes me that the latest appeal is very much in line with other appeals and it's difficult to see why it registers as newsworthy given what is going on in the world: another quiet day in the Telegraph offices? 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FLOSS Posted April 17, 2017 Share Posted April 17, 2017 (edited) Given the Telegraph's politics I should have thought that the paper would have been pleased that the Royal Ballet was raising money to cover its needs rather than criticising it for doing so.The article seems to have been written by a journalist who covers a wide range of stories rather than someone who reports on the arts and its tone seems to be designed to generate a negative response from its readership about the company's activities. In that respect it strikes me that it is not that different from the story which the same paper ran at the time that Muntagirov joined the Royal Ballet in which it accused the company of poaching him from the ENB. That article was written by a journalist whose specialist area of activity seemed to be gossip and entertainment rather than culture and the arts. Both of the articles were very negative and critical in tone and but their subject matter was scarcely newsworthy. Is the Telegraph trying to tell its readership something about the company or the arts in general or has it simply inadvertently published a couple of negative non stories about the same company? Edited April 17, 2017 by FLOSS 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capybara Posted April 17, 2017 Share Posted April 17, 2017 The RB has been encouraging people to sponsor roles/costumes for around 10 years at least. ENB has adopted a similar practice. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jan McNulty Posted April 17, 2017 Share Posted April 17, 2017 1 minute ago, capybara said: The RB has been encouraging people to sponsor roles/costumes for around 10 years at least. ENB has adopted a similar practice. And BRB and NB and, IIRC, SB. I think it's a terrific idea. Having donated in a small way a couple of times it makes me feel "involved" in the production. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Macmillan Posted June 29, 2017 Author Share Posted June 29, 2017 Today's Times tells me that Times 2 tomorrow will run a Xander Parish feature. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alison Posted June 29, 2017 Share Posted June 29, 2017 I guess the Mariinsky must be coming 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pas de Quatre Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 There is a fabulous photo on the Times main front page of Xander in a grand jete, then another full page portrait on the cover of Time 2 with a substantial article inside. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
capybara Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 1 hour ago, Pas de Quatre said: There is a fabulous photo on the Times main front page of Xander in a grand jete, then another full page portrait on the cover of Time 2 with a substantial article inside. Yes, but the strapline for the front page photo misleading reads: "Xander Parish will make a triumphant return to the Royal Ballet as the lead in Swan Lake". The article covers familiar ground but it is lovely that Xander is getting this well-deserved coverage. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pas de Quatre Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 Yeah - you can't have everything! The strapline is obviously written by some minion who hasn't a clue! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwissBalletFan Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 (edited) 1 hour ago, Pas de Quatre said: Yeah - you can't have everything! The strapline is obviously written by some minion who hasn't a clue! There has been a concerted effort to try to convince Royal Ballet and their public that Xander should return to the company after his wonderful success abroad. I think that this is part of that effort, and I hope that Royal Management will have a good think about whether they should invite him back, it is clear that Xander himself (from his comments in the press and social media) would very much like to. Edited June 30, 2017 by SwissBalletFan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pas de Quatre Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 No - I think you have misunderstood me SBF. The caption says he is appearing with the Royal Ballet. Who ever wrote it thought that as the performances are at the Royal Opera House it must be the Royal Ballet dancing, obviously unaware of the Mariinsky visit. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beryl H Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 When I pulled the paper out of the letterbox this morning and saw a ballet dancer on the front page I immediately thought it was Sergei Polunin, very pleased it was Xander Parish, haven't read it yet but there was also a leading article which is for the important news, so he was on 3 pages! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwissBalletFan Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 2 hours ago, Pas de Quatre said: No - I think you have misunderstood me SBF. The caption says he is appearing with the Royal Ballet. Who ever wrote it thought that as the performances are at the Royal Opera House it must be the Royal Ballet dancing, obviously unaware of the Mariinsky visit. I understood, I think maybe I was misunderstood, but that happens a lot, so no problem. I was referring to the fact that I would not be too confident that it was 'a minion with no clue' rather than..'a minion who knew what they were doing and the effect it may have' Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BMC Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 Really enjoyed the piece on Xander Parish and the beautiful photos (he sounds a very modest and appealing person). And fantastic to see him getting an editorial in the main section as well - we don't often get that for dancers! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alison Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 SBF: I don't think you're familiar with the general level of sub-editing on UK newspapers 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
penelopesimpson Posted June 30, 2017 Share Posted June 30, 2017 6 hours ago, Pas de Quatre said: Yeah - you can't have everything! The strapline is obviously written by some minion who hasn't a clue! Probably the Darts correspondent. Sigh. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Macmillan Posted July 1, 2017 Author Share Posted July 1, 2017 For the record, today's Times carries a correction to yesterday's picture caption. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now