Ian Macmillan Posted December 24, 2016 Share Posted December 24, 2016 After a gap of some 20 years, The Times has today revived its costings of the various gifts bestowed in The Twelve Days of Christmas. Overall, the cost this year would be £22,803 as compared to £14,837 in 1995 but, in real terms, this year's total is reported as less since, had the basket of goodies risen in price with the RPI, it would have cost £26,637 this year. Thus "a diehard romantic spoiling his true love would be £3,834 better off this year." There is, however, considerable variation in the comparative costings of the various items listed - and of interest here, "Dancers have benefited most from wage inflation while the poor partridge has dived in value." This conclusion was reached by asking Equity to quote for 11 Ladies Dancing, drawn from first-year members of the Royal Ballet Corps, on a week's pay to cover the two nights on which they were billed to appear (nights 11 and 12, presumably), with time to rehearse and attend classes. In 1995 this would have cost £2,750 but this year that has risen to £7,236 a 166% increase. (A partridge, by comparison, cost £3.99 in 1995 but just £3.60 today.) The same Equity ballet contract in 1957, when my wife joined the then Opera Ballet, was signed by David Webster and paid just £7-10s a week. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lisa O`Brien Posted December 24, 2016 Share Posted December 24, 2016 After a gap of some 20 years, The Times has today revived its costings of the various gifts bestowed in The Twelve Days of Christmas. Overall, the cost this year would be £22,803 as compared to £14,837 in 1995 but, in real terms, this year's total is reported as less since, had the basket of goodies risen in price with the RPI, it would have cost £26,637 this year. Thus "a diehard romantic spoiling his true love would be £3,834 better off this year." There is, however, considerable variation in the comparative costings of the various items listed - and of interest here, "Dancers have benefited most from wage inflation while the poor partridge has dived in value." This conclusion was reached by asking Equity to quote for 11 Ladies Dancing, drawn from first-year members of the Royal Ballet Corps, on a week's pay to cover the two nights on which they were billed to appear (nights 11 and 12, presumably), with time to rehearse and attend classes. In 1995 this would have cost £2,750 but this year that has risen to £7,236 a 166% increase. (A partridge, by comparison, cost £3.99 in 1995 but just £3.60 today.) The same Equity ballet contract in 1957, when my wife joined the then Opera Ballet, was signed by David Webster and paid just £7-10s a week. What, 1st yr RB Corps dancers earn £7,236 a WEEK? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tony Newcombe Posted December 24, 2016 Share Posted December 24, 2016 They wish!!!!!!!! 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
toursenlair Posted December 24, 2016 Share Posted December 24, 2016 What, 1st yr RB Corps dancers earn £7,236 a WEEK? for 11 of them, presumably. That would be the lords a-leaping, though, because there are only 9 ladies dancing in the version I know. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwissBalletFan Posted December 24, 2016 Share Posted December 24, 2016 (edited) Goodness, an interesting point Ian, however could we all get on the same page factually, especially when discussing a VERY important figure which is decidedly, that ballet dancers pay. In the original song :https://www.carols.org.uk/the_twe1ve_days_of_christmas.htm it is nine ladies dancing. In the times article http://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/price-of-true-love-falls-3-834-in-20-years-b9jk0sjgm it also quotes eleven ladies dancing. With the amount including rehearsals, and for all dancers....not so much, so please applaud and be generous to your ballet dancers this christmas The phrase 'spurious accuracy' comes to mind especially when such dubious mathematics / economics is quoted to the penny. Edited December 24, 2016 by SwissBalletFan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ian Macmillan Posted December 24, 2016 Author Share Posted December 24, 2016 Katherine: You got me thinking and a check with my Oxford Book of Carols tells me that, sure enough, I've always sung about Nine Ladies Dancing - and a further check with a Wikipedia entry reveals considerable change in the gifts given over some 250 years: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Twelve_Days_of_Christmas_(song) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zxDaveM Posted December 24, 2016 Share Posted December 24, 2016 Surely a partridge would have soured in value, as we have wiped out all but 5-10% of them compared to days past Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Quintus Posted December 24, 2016 Share Posted December 24, 2016 £7236 for 11 man-weeks of first year corps dancers would put them on £34K a year, which sadly seems unlikely - unless Equity built overtime into the figure they quoted Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SwissBalletFan Posted December 24, 2016 Share Posted December 24, 2016 £7236 for 11 man-weeks of first year corps dancers would put them on £34K a year, which sadly seems unlikely - unless Equity built overtime into the figure they quoted I think if anything, I think the summer break and holidays would have to be included into your annual salary calculations. Also, pension payments, insurances. The difference would be akin to what a consultant charges per day vs what an employee would earn in the same role. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zxDaveM Posted December 24, 2016 Share Posted December 24, 2016 8, 9, 11 dancers dancing - gotta be at least a £3m bill if they were paid their truth worth surely!! 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxi4ballet Posted December 25, 2016 Share Posted December 25, 2016 Are they also including the cost of pointe shoes and costumes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Melody Posted December 26, 2016 Share Posted December 26, 2016 Not sure if it's an American thing, but all the versions I'm familiar with have nine ladies dancing. The lords, pipers, and drummers are rather interchangeable though. So however much it costs, it's only 9/11ths of what The Times seems to think it costs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
taxi4ballet Posted December 27, 2016 Share Posted December 27, 2016 It is 9, no idea where they got 11 from. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now